<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HomePNA Ethernet over CATV Coax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/</link>
	<description>Love the little trade which thou hast learned, and be content therewith</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 23:01:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lunavia</title>
		<link>http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/comment-page-1/#comment-15857</link>
		<dc:creator>Lunavia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 04:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/#comment-15857</guid>
		<description>Ethernet over existing TV Coaxial cable.  
CTC Union’s product EOC 20 &amp; EOC 21 are best ethernet to coaxial LAN extender. TV and ethernet can go on single coax cable. multiple tapping can be donne using tap/splitter. link..
http://www.ctcu.com.tw/index.php?option=com_virtuemart&amp;page=shop.browse&amp;category_id=79&amp;Itemid=56</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethernet over existing TV Coaxial cable.<br />
CTC Union’s product EOC 20 &amp; EOC 21 are best ethernet to coaxial LAN extender. TV and ethernet can go on single coax cable. multiple tapping can be donne using tap/splitter. link..<br />
<a href="http://www.ctcu.com.tw/index.php?option=com_virtuemart&#038;page=shop.browse&#038;category_id=79&#038;Itemid=56" rel="nofollow">http://www.ctcu.com.tw/index.php?option=com_virtuemart&#038;page=shop.browse&#038;category_id=79&#038;Itemid=56</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elk M1</title>
		<link>http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/comment-page-1/#comment-7632</link>
		<dc:creator>Elk M1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/#comment-7632</guid>
		<description>70 mbps is pretty decent - I&#039;ve been tweaking and unable to break the 50 mbps mark so you should be happy!  Lol at the coax &quot;before&quot; pic, looks like my outside box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>70 mbps is pretty decent &#8211; I&#8217;ve been tweaking and unable to break the 50 mbps mark so you should be happy!  Lol at the coax &#8220;before&#8221; pic, looks like my outside box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/comment-page-1/#comment-6518</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/#comment-6518</guid>
		<description>Ah shame it doesnt steam 1080p well.  I was looking forward to using it.  Nice post though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah shame it doesnt steam 1080p well.  I was looking forward to using it.  Nice post though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIck West</title>
		<link>http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/comment-page-1/#comment-6324</link>
		<dc:creator>MIck West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/#comment-6324</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info Chris,  I&#039;ll update the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info Chris,  I&#8217;ll update the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Geiser</title>
		<link>http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/comment-page-1/#comment-6323</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Geiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/#comment-6323</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m Chris Geiser, the Product Line Manager for the NETGEAR MoCA bridges.  The MCAB1001 works fine on the Verizon FIOS network and has been extensively tested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m Chris Geiser, the Product Line Manager for the NETGEAR MoCA bridges.  The MCAB1001 works fine on the Verizon FIOS network and has been extensively tested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick West</title>
		<link>http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/comment-page-1/#comment-4954</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/#comment-4954</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;ll see if can give it go sometime, and post the results.  Anyone know of good sample media to use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ll see if can give it go sometime, and post the results.  Anyone know of good sample media to use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lehti</title>
		<link>http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/comment-page-1/#comment-4951</link>
		<dc:creator>Lehti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/#comment-4951</guid>
		<description>The 8MB/s is not good enough for streaming in Full HD. Have tried it through wireless and that is a limit that must be dealth with. You could always get 720p instead of 1080p ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 8MB/s is not good enough for streaming in Full HD. Have tried it through wireless and that is a limit that must be dealth with. You could always get 720p instead of 1080p ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick West</title>
		<link>http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/comment-page-1/#comment-4881</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/#comment-4881</guid>
		<description>Really? I get a solid throughput of 70 Mbps, how is that not enough?  BluRay 1920x1080p has a max bitrate of 40Mbps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? I get a solid throughput of 70 Mbps, how is that not enough?  BluRay 1920x1080p has a max bitrate of 40Mbps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hammer</title>
		<link>http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/comment-page-1/#comment-4880</link>
		<dc:creator>Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/#comment-4880</guid>
		<description>None of these solutions are capable of reliably streaming High definition video (1920x1080P).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None of these solutions are capable of reliably streaming High definition video (1920x1080P).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holy</title>
		<link>http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/comment-page-1/#comment-3705</link>
		<dc:creator>Holy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mickwest.com/2008/03/24/homepna-ethernet-over-catv-coax/#comment-3705</guid>
		<description>Thanks for a helpful article, it&#039;s realy very interesting info for me.
My dph548 make happy me and works fine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for a helpful article, it&#8217;s realy very interesting info for me.<br />
My dph548 make happy me and works fine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.559 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-05 18:20:31 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
