<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wiring the house with Cat5e for Gigabit Ethernet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mickwest.com/2007/11/26/wiring-the-house-with-for-cat5e-gigabit-ethernet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mickwest.com/2007/11/26/wiring-the-house-with-for-cat5e-gigabit-ethernet/</link>
	<description>Love the little trade which thou hast learned, and be content therewith</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 04:53:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mick West</title>
		<link>http://mickwest.com/2007/11/26/wiring-the-house-with-for-cat5e-gigabit-ethernet/comment-page-1/#comment-7914</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mickwest.com/2007/11/26/wiring-the-house-with-for-cat5e-gigabit-ethernet/#comment-7914</guid>
		<description>Cat5e is a specific type of cable with 4 twisted pairs, there is also Cat5 (without the e).   And Cat4 and Cat3.  The type of cable is usually printed on the cable sleeve. 

It&#039;s probably that you have at least Cat5, which should give you fine gigabit performance on the short runs inside a home.  You can in theory even use Cat4/3 for gigabit ethernet, depending on the length of the cable and sources of interference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cat5e is a specific type of cable with 4 twisted pairs, there is also Cat5 (without the e).   And Cat4 and Cat3.  The type of cable is usually printed on the cable sleeve. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably that you have at least Cat5, which should give you fine gigabit performance on the short runs inside a home.  You can in theory even use Cat4/3 for gigabit ethernet, depending on the length of the cable and sources of interference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://mickwest.com/2007/11/26/wiring-the-house-with-for-cat5e-gigabit-ethernet/comment-page-1/#comment-7911</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mickwest.com/2007/11/26/wiring-the-house-with-for-cat5e-gigabit-ethernet/#comment-7911</guid>
		<description>I would like to make the switch to Gigabit in my home for the same reasons outlined in this article but have a quick question.

I already have a home network in my house and all of the cable is punched down with 4 twisted pair (8 total).  Does that mean I already have CAT5e that is capable of Gigabit?

If so, then all I have to do is purchase a few Gigabit switches, but wanted to ask before I spent the money.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to make the switch to Gigabit in my home for the same reasons outlined in this article but have a quick question.</p>
<p>I already have a home network in my house and all of the cable is punched down with 4 twisted pair (8 total).  Does that mean I already have CAT5e that is capable of Gigabit?</p>
<p>If so, then all I have to do is purchase a few Gigabit switches, but wanted to ask before I spent the money.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Jones</title>
		<link>http://mickwest.com/2007/11/26/wiring-the-house-with-for-cat5e-gigabit-ethernet/comment-page-1/#comment-3123</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mickwest.com/2007/11/26/wiring-the-house-with-for-cat5e-gigabit-ethernet/#comment-3123</guid>
		<description>Awesome job! Wished mine looked as good, but it&#039;s more like a tangled mess of cables. I decided to go wireless for the upstairs because it would be so hard to run the cable through the existing walls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome job! Wished mine looked as good, but it&#8217;s more like a tangled mess of cables. I decided to go wireless for the upstairs because it would be so hard to run the cable through the existing walls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dallas Cabling</title>
		<link>http://mickwest.com/2007/11/26/wiring-the-house-with-for-cat5e-gigabit-ethernet/comment-page-1/#comment-2952</link>
		<dc:creator>Dallas Cabling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mickwest.com/2007/11/26/wiring-the-house-with-for-cat5e-gigabit-ethernet/#comment-2952</guid>
		<description>Mick,
this is a great DIY project, and you&#039;ve laid out the steps very nicely. Unlike you though, if I were to try this, all would not go well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mick,<br />
this is a great DIY project, and you&#8217;ve laid out the steps very nicely. Unlike you though, if I were to try this, all would not go well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techy Bob, regarding network cabling</title>
		<link>http://mickwest.com/2007/11/26/wiring-the-house-with-for-cat5e-gigabit-ethernet/comment-page-1/#comment-2194</link>
		<dc:creator>Techy Bob, regarding network cabling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 03:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mickwest.com/2007/11/26/wiring-the-house-with-for-cat5e-gigabit-ethernet/#comment-2194</guid>
		<description>Nice informative post Mick.

Jack wrote:

&quot;I prefer wired connection instead of wireless because on my point of view it is more stable.&quot;

Jack I&#039;ve found that there is a good place for both wired and wireless in the home.  My wife and I have six kids and a lot of Internet gamers in the house.  They need the wired connections for gaming as the latency with wireless can pose a problem.  However, my wife and I love to sit out on the back deck with a glass of wine and our laptops and enjoy the wireless connectivity.

Best regards to all,

Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice informative post Mick.</p>
<p>Jack wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;I prefer wired connection instead of wireless because on my point of view it is more stable.&#8221;</p>
<p>Jack I&#8217;ve found that there is a good place for both wired and wireless in the home.  My wife and I have six kids and a lot of Internet gamers in the house.  They need the wired connections for gaming as the latency with wireless can pose a problem.  However, my wife and I love to sit out on the back deck with a glass of wine and our laptops and enjoy the wireless connectivity.</p>
<p>Best regards to all,</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacky</title>
		<link>http://mickwest.com/2007/11/26/wiring-the-house-with-for-cat5e-gigabit-ethernet/comment-page-1/#comment-1979</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 02:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mickwest.com/2007/11/26/wiring-the-house-with-for-cat5e-gigabit-ethernet/#comment-1979</guid>
		<description>I did my home network cabling this way and I spent about 200 ft of cable. I prefer wired connection instead of wireless because on my point of view it is more stable.
I enjoyed doing this work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did my home network cabling this way and I spent about 200 ft of cable. I prefer wired connection instead of wireless because on my point of view it is more stable.<br />
I enjoyed doing this work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beth</title>
		<link>http://mickwest.com/2007/11/26/wiring-the-house-with-for-cat5e-gigabit-ethernet/comment-page-1/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 03:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mickwest.com/2007/11/26/wiring-the-house-with-for-cat5e-gigabit-ethernet/#comment-825</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got to say... that&#039;s a pretty impressive picture. Reminds me of that scene in the Matrix where NEO is connected to all those tubes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got to say&#8230; that&#8217;s a pretty impressive picture. Reminds me of that scene in the Matrix where NEO is connected to all those tubes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.117 seconds -->
